//
you're reading...

Entertainment

Are we ready for Marrygold?

So appar­ently the name of this new-age match­mak­ing com­pany is Mar­ry­gold : a take on the flower marigold used for wed­dings and aus­pi­cious ceremonies.

When I got this email, I was tempted to laugh it off. But then I read it once again and it made more sense the sec­ond time round.

Isn’t it true that many young peo­ple today are look­ing for the man/woman of their dreams but don’t have the time/energy/means to find some­one suitable?


They work hours on end, and there’s hardly any time on the week­ends. It goes in a flurry : pay­ing bills, clean­ing house and catch­ing one’s breath : and then it’s time to start the next week again.

So where is the time to embark on a jour­ney to find Mr or Ms Right? I have sev­eral friends who have not found their ‘ideal’ mates even after years of look­ing. I got an email recently from a school friend who writes that she hasn’t given up on love, she’s just wait­ing for Mr Right.

But how does one find Mr Right (Ms Right)? Per­son­ally, I am quite cyn­i­cal about the whole con­cept. I think if you find a per­son com­pat­i­ble, who shares some of your ideals and beliefs, who you like spend­ing time with — isn’t that enough to go ahead? What are the char­ac­ter­is­tics of a ‘Mr Right’, I am yet to deter­mine. But I digress.

Are we ready for this kind of a ser­vice? Or do we still tend to go back to tra­di­tional means of find­ing part­ners? A few friends have found love beyond age, reli­gion, state bound­aries : on the Inter­net and some via other inno­v­a­tive and inter­est­ing means! A recent cou­ple I met said they got acquainted through the radio. She heard him giv­ing an inter­view on Radio City, emailed him. They spoke, exchanged emails, met. And love blossomed!

So are we today, more open to look­ing for love, beyond the estab­lished means? Are we, as a gen­er­a­tion, open to mar­ry­ing out­side our com­mu­ni­ties, states, castes, reli­gions etc?

In my opin­ion, we aren’t. Most friends who are look­ing for their suit­able mates, still tend to stick to their own com­mu­ni­ties, not will­ing to look beyond either because it will be unac­cept­able from the family’s side or they’re not will­ing to take the risk (if it is one). Par­ents too, inspite of bring­ing up their kids in cos­mopoli­tan envi­ron­ments go back to their com­mu­ni­ties when it comes to the ques­tion of the big M.

So where do we stand today? Do we need a Mar­ry­gold or are we per­fectly ready to find part­ners using the tra­di­tional means?

I’d live to know what you think, what­ever state you’re in : sin­gle, mar­ried, look­ing, not look­ing, cyn­i­cal, optimistic…

Match­mak­ing with a difference

“In the hus­tle and bus­tle of the urban liv­ing, peo­ple have lesser time to inter­act and choose life part­ners. We thought about this sit­u­a­tion and the idea to assist peo­ple in match mak­ing struck us.

Mar­ry­gold’ intends to help pro­fes­sion­als above 25years of age, who do not have much time to focus on find­ing part­ners for mar­riage. We meet peo­ple who approach us, find out their expec­ta­tions, and assist them in find­ing the per­son they are look­ing for. Mar­ry­gold is con­cerned about the mind and emo­tional com­pat­i­bil­ity of peo­ple who want to get mar­ried. Thus, the focus is not on caste, creed, and horo­scope as cri­te­ria for mar­riage. We expect the same from those who need our assistance.

To reg­is­ter, we col­lect a nom­i­nal fee. We look at like-minded peo­ple, edu­ca­tion and com­pat­i­bil­ity when look­ing for an individual’s life part­ner. At a later stage, we involve the fam­i­lies to final­ize the mar­riage. We take ref­er­ences of friends and fam­ily mem­bers from each appli­cant and ver­ify the authen­tic­ity and inten­tion before pro­ceed­ing with registration.

Reg­is­tra­tion form has a per­sonal touch to help us know more about an indi­vid­ual and his/her choice of part­ner. We find out like-minded peo­ple among the appli­cants or even out­side, meet them, and fix a time and place for both to have a con­ver­sa­tion. This is usu­ally in cof­fee shops or other such places and not in secluded places. We then let them take a decision.

Mar­ry­gold’ is coined from the flower ‘marigold’, which is used along rose petals to shower bless­ings on cou­ples in Indian wed­dings. The orange colour of the flower sig­ni­fies Hope and Optimism.”

Details:
Mar­ry­gold
1564–1566 Nil­giris Super Mar­ket Cross Road
St. Thomas Town P O
Kamana­halli
Ban­ga­lore –560 084 (land­mark — Nil­giris Mar­ket)
Ph: 080–25806055
marrygold.co@gmail.com

Con­tact Match­mak­ers : Nan­dini Chakraborty & Aparna Viswanathan

Discussion

30 Responses to “Are we ready for Marrygold?”

  1. already married.…moi take …dont need some­thing like Mar­ry­Gold to find a partner…

    Posted by Mehak | March 22, 2006, 7:29 pm
  2. Inter­est­ing! It sounds like another mat­ri­mo­nial bureau. One can find many in Ban­ga­lore. Maybe I can give it a try here as well. ;)

    Posted by hardu | March 23, 2006, 1:26 am
  3. Anita, this is evry inter­est­ing… esp the last bit — what are “tra­di­tional means” — what mar­ry­gold does, i.e. match­mak­ing, is one of the most tra­di­tional means of find­ing a part­ner! but it is inter­est­ing the way they have pos­i­toined them­selves– to begin with, the 25+ age is a very clever move… I guess more and more young peo­ple are opt­ing for such means of find­ing partners…

    Posted by charu | March 23, 2006, 5:15 pm
  4. i would love to out­source the match­mak­ing part!

    Posted by Rajiv | March 23, 2006, 5:54 pm
  5. Ha! Ha ! I laughed at first, it was some­thing about Marry and Gold together, sounded like a greedy con­no­ta­tion. Any­way, I would say it is not a bad busi­ness ven­ture at all.

    Posted by Deepa | March 23, 2006, 9:04 pm
  6. Anita, I am not sure what pro­fes­sion you are in. But atleast its pop­u­lar in techies to use such ser­vice. It saves time which we have to spend in the tra­di­tional ways and best thing is they can do it at their desktops ;)

    Posted by Life is Colorful | March 24, 2006, 1:39 am
  7. Well, its not a bad idea — given the fact that there are web­sites now tak­ing match mak­ing to new dimen­sions such as e-harmony.com which even offers com­pat­i­bil­ity tests and what not. Would I use one such ser­vice — yes , why because am of the type who’ll try any­thing and every­thing *sane* in this world before I die :).

    Posted by Pradeep | March 24, 2006, 10:34 pm
  8. What is BlogDesam.com

    BlogDesam.com is a por­tal for Blogs(Weblogs) writ­ten in Eng­lish. It incor­po­rates list­ing of blogs, newfeed (loosely rss) aggre­ga­tion, addi­tional value-added ser­vices pro­vided with a pleas­ant user inter­face. BlogDe­sam is one-of-a-kind in many aspects.

    BlogDe­sam offers the fol­low­ing fea­tures, many of which are unique:

    For all the listed blogs (with­out the need of insert­ing any code/link into your blog):
    Instantly update and dis­play of your post’s pre­view in the BlogDe­sam homepage.(Show me how)
    Cat­e­gorise every post of yours, so that your posts reach the right kind of (tar­get­ted) vis­i­tors of BlogDesam.

    Addi­tional ben­e­fits for the listed blogs that use the unique ‘Pathivu’ tool­bar (needs one-time inser­tion of a tiny javascript code seg­ment into the blog tem­plate):
    Com­mu­ni­cate auto­mat­i­cally the arrival of new com­ment for a post to BlogDe­sam por­tal, and gets listed under ‘Recently com­mented posts’.
    ‘Ping’(inform) the aggre­ga­tor straight from your blogs and instantly update the posts.
    Dis­play a thumb­nail image along with the post-preview, taken from the blogger’s pro­file.
    Enable a vis­i­tor to nav­i­gate to other recent posts writ­ten under the same cat­e­gory, through single-click.
    Enable a vis­i­tor to get a pdf ver­sion of a single-post or multiple-posts of his/her choice, includ­ing image sup­port.
    Let the vis­i­tors rate a post based on karma-voting sys­tem, again through single-click.
    Con­fig­ure all the above fea­tures. e.g. if the blog­ger does not want the pdf facil­ity or the rat­ing of posts, he can switch these off.
    Lastly, Hide the tool­bar dis­play com­pletely in your post, but still retain the com­ment track­ing facility.

    Ben­e­fits for the visitors:

    Keep minute-by-minute track­ing of what is going on in the blo­gos­phere.
    Pre­view the posts by cat­e­gory and display/hide select cat­e­gories of your choice.
    Nav­i­gate through the archives of posts, by date, fil­tered by cat­e­gories.
    Search the listed blogs for any word, that can be extended to today, the past week, or the past month.
    Get pdf e-books made instantly from the posts of your choice (requires blogger’s coop­er­a­tion, though) for off-line reading/carry-in-your-palm-during-commute/emailing.

    Posted by ilavanji | March 25, 2006, 2:33 am
  9. its a good way of match­mak­ing with out all the for­mal frills.

    Posted by dante | March 25, 2006, 4:42 pm
  10. I guess irre­spec­tive of how much analy­sis / com­pat­i­bil­ity tests that one per­forms prior to the mar­riage, the real test only starts post mar­riage.
    Its what one does post mar­riage that counts rather than how much of plan­ning and think­ing that one does prior to it.
    This is the only place where the old adage “proper plan­ning is 80% bat­tle won” does not apply.

    Posted by hemanth | March 26, 2006, 11:57 am
  11. Some yrs ago I was scep­ti­cal of all such sites..But now I have seen so many young­sters going ahead with it and really find­ing part­ners they and fam­i­lies approve of,that i now feel that it is a great way forward..

    Posted by Sangita | March 26, 2006, 6:14 pm
  12. Hi Anita, like some of the com­menters above I per­son­ally know a cou­ple peo­ple who have used match­mak­ing sites (and pre­sum­ably is what Mar­ry­gold is another one) and have suc­cess­fully found life part­ners through them. In those cases it was a “last resort” option where the issue wasn’t so much about not hav­ing the time — but was more moti­vated by the fact that the sheer avail­abil­ity of can­di­dates (I hate to use this sort of lan­guage!) had dried up and there was a need to cast the net more widely — some­thing that the Inter­net has made much more pos­si­ble I sup­pose. Of course, being mar­ried myself I can­not judge whether I would use such a ser­vice — but I cer­tainly would have con­sid­ered it if I really felt lonely and frus­trated at not being able to find a part­ner through more tra­di­tional “offline” means. (You see, my wife and I met for the first time dur­ing a mutual friend’s birth­day din­ner party which I attended with another lady-friend I was dat­ing at the time — but lady-friend and I had a bust up at the din­ner table and we ended up trav­el­ling sep­a­rately on the way home after­wards — which is when I found myself sit­ting on sub­ur­ban train next to my wife-to-be! There is some­thing about the “fate” of it that I am much more com­fort­able with than pre­med­i­ta­tion involved with an Inter­net search.) Also I prob­a­bly wouldn’t want to use a ser­vice which attempted to find a part­ner with com­mon inter­ests as me: I’m not sure I could spend the rest of my life with some­one exactly like me!

    Posted by Jag | March 27, 2006, 6:43 pm
  13. I thinks that nowa­days there is so much of choice and guys/girls do not have the time to actu­ally search and find a guy for them­selves. So they would rather have some agency search for them.

    Funny thing is that they would rather have an agency search for them than have their own par­ents {who would be look­ing for­ward to doing this} do it.

    Posted by reghu | March 29, 2006, 5:14 pm
  14. hey there… inter­est­ing read.. am gonna keep all this in my mind and lets see how i can make mar­ry­gold bet­ter or dif­fer­ent … or should i just change the name a lil…
    nan­dini
    founder
    marrygold

    Posted by nandini | April 1, 2006, 12:04 pm
  15. “In the hus­tle and bus­tle of the urban liv­ing, peo­ple have lesser time to inter­act and choose life partners”

    If sin­gles donot have the time to search for part­ners, how will they have the time to devote for their nup­tial partnership???..

    Posted by Dave | June 12, 2006, 12:55 pm
  16. For a per­son like me who’s 34 the web sites and ser­vices like this are a great way of meet­ing peo­ple. Arranged mar­riage was always an unac­cept­able option. I con­sider these servies just a means of meet­ing peo­ple, noth­ing more, the respon­si­b­lity of know­ing what one needs rests with me still.

    Posted by anir | June 22, 2006, 11:01 am
  17. Hey Anita,

    I have come across your blog recently. I found it refresh­ing and very nice. Keep up the good work. I must says I did saw cou­ple of your and other pho­tog­ra­pher frens’ pic on Flickr. And I am amazed You folks are won­der­ful at cam­era.. Keep up the good work.
    I am com­ment­ing on this post. Cos this kind of touches the chord inside. I got mar­ried almost 3 years now. I never used any web­site. But my hus­band did pay for Shaadi.com. And sur­pris­ing He landed a per­son who never liked the idea of putting once choice on inter­net about life part­ner. But now times are chang­ing fast.. One can find loe any­where.. And may not find love any where too. What I think , find­ing our imag­i­na­tion are some­time so per­fect that its hard to find some­one near around to fill it up..

    Posted by Zeya | March 6, 2007, 4:54 am
  18. Out­sourc­ing hasn’t spared mat­ri­mo­nial ser­vices. Out­source and excel is the mantra today.

    Posted by Indian Blogger | March 21, 2007, 12:19 am
  19. Hi,

    Can any­one give me the most updated ctc details of Mar­ry­gold, am not able to get through them.

    Warm Rgds
    Priya

    Posted by priya | July 11, 2007, 4:08 pm
  20. Hi,
    all i can say about this is that my expe­ri­ence as a guardina of my child with this ser­vice has been sim­ply terrible.No point is enrolling in with such ser­vice providers who do not have a sense of committment

    Posted by Vilas | August 21, 2007, 3:54 pm
  21. You would not believe what astrol­ogy can do for match­mak­ing. What makes it really help­ful is that peo­ple can’t sup­ply false answers to appli­ca­tions. They’re opin­ion of them­self does not mat­ter. What their charts say they are, is all that matters.

    Posted by gaby | January 17, 2008, 10:29 pm
  22. A friend of mine had enrolled in this ser­vice in 2006–2007, and I was think­ing to enroll, but he found it a waste of money. The providers have no cred­i­ble back­ground in this area. There is no sense of com­mit­ment, they would often pro­vide mis­matched pro­files, and were poor in their com­mu­ni­ca­tion (they just dis­ap­peared after the mem­ber­ship term ended, no mes­sages or offer to keep looking)

    Posted by Tarun | May 8, 2008, 8:50 am
  23. i like the con­cept and read it in news paper more than a year ago. now gotto see a blog in this. my wishes for this team to help many to find a match

    Posted by Ansari | September 17, 2008, 5:01 pm
  24. thanks very much, great infor­ma­tion. Keep up the great work.

    Posted by Alex | May 28, 2009, 8:34 pm
  25. Hallo I have been try­ing to get your tele­phone no but to no avail and we do indeed need to con­tact you . Could you please mail or sms your phone nos or mail me ? The old nos of mar­ry­gold have changed .thank you rekha rao mob 9591232410

    Posted by Rekha rao | December 5, 2011, 11:19 am

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] Too busy to fall in love or don’t fancy an arranged mar­riage? Anita tells us about a new ser­vice — Mar­ry­gold — that seeks to help ‘young busy pro­fes­sion­als find the per­son they are look­ing for”. Noth­ing more than a reformed mar­riage bureau, I say. […]

  2. […] Just a lit­tle some­thing, on a new ser­vice called Mar­ry­Gold, which says — “‘Mar­ry­gold’ intends to help pro­fes­sion­als above 25years of age, who do not have much time to focus on find­ing part­ners for marriage.” […]

  3. girl hair bows

    Rel­e­vant search results and links for girl hair bows

    girl hair bows - June 6, 2007
  4. FaiSyn Fil­ter Design 2.1 crack

    FaiSyn Fil­ter Design 2.1 crack

    FaiSyn Filter Design 2.1 crack - January 25, 2008
  5. […] writes about Mar­ry­gold, a new-age match­mak­ing ser­vice. When I got this email, I was tempted to laugh it off. But then I […]

Post a Comment

Photos on flickr

Daily Mile